Category Archives for "Politician Nonsense"

February 1, 2011

You’ll Never Look at the Sky the Same Way After This

What in the World are They Spraying?

If you’ve looked up in the sky lately, you’ve likely seen cloud formations that we simply didn’t see 10 or 15 years ago. Some say they are simply condensation trails left from jets passing over. But, mounting evidence indicates something else entirely, and bluntly, something extremely difficult to confront, particularly when nobody who should know what it is we’re looking at, will admit to knowing anything other than, “They’re simply condensation trails.”

This documentary presents quite a different picture.  Its producers traveled around the planet in search of answers to some very simple questions, “Are we being sprayed from the sky?”, “Why do the trails go from horizon to horizon?”, “How could a totally cloudless day, become what appears to be an overcast day, resulting from these jet trails spreading out to the point of literally covering the sky?”, and “What do these so-called ChemTrails consist of?”

My wife and I live in Florida on the Gulf Coast.  I took the picture below on Christmas Day 2003 from my friend’s balcony facing the Gulf of Mexico, and I actually didn’t even notice the condition of the sky until I reviewed my photos on my computer a few days later.  When I brought this particular picture up in my photo editor and enlarged it, my jaw dropped.  My initial response was, “What the hell is that all over the sky!?”  The only natural cloud is the one just over the buildings near the middle of the photo. The rest of what’s covering the sky in the photo is man-made. That was my baptism into the Contrail/Chemtrail controversy.

chemtrails

Over the years since that Christmas Day in 2003, I have researched both sides of this controversy and found myself on and off the fence again and again about what I was actually seeing in the skies. But this recent Documentary, which you can view in its entirety here, knocked me off the fence, possibly for good.

April 24, 2010

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them..

A friend of mine emailed the following to me, and I felt it was too important and too interesting to not include in my own blog. So, here it is. Enjoy!
Ron Savelo

Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years, reporting on everything from sports to politics. From 1969-71, he worked as a campaign staffer for gubernatorial, senatorial and congressional races in several states. He was an editor, assistant to the publisher, and columnist for the Orlando Sentinel from 1971 to 2001. He now writes a syndicated column three times a week for King Features. Reese served two years active duty in the U.S. Army as a tank gunner.

545 PEOPLE–By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them..

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget.  The president does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations.  The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress.  In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.  They have no legal authority.  They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing.  I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.  The politician has the power to accept or reject it.  No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault.  They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall.  No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits…. .  The president can only propose a budget.  He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes.  Who is the speaker of the House?  Nancy Pelosi.  She is the leader of the majority party.  She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want.  If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace
545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility.  I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.  When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red ..

If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it’s because they want them in IRAQ If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.  Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power..

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.
March 8, 2010

The Census Is Getting Way Too Personal

QUESTIONS THAT THE CENSUS BUREAU REFUSED OR FAILED TO ANSWER (from Jerry Day’s Matrix News Network segment: “The Census Is Getting Personal”):

1) The Constitution authorizes government to count people but it does not authorize the taking of private information or even the names of individuals. From where does the Census Bureau derive authority to demand our private information?

2) Is there any limit to the amount and type of private information that the Census bureau may demand and collect?

3) Under what Constitutional authority does the Census Bureau collect information now from 250,000 people per month of every year?

4) The 4th Amendment to the Constitution prohibits government search and seizure of private information without a court warrant based on probable cause, Current Census policies violate that Amendment do they not?

5) By what Constitutional authority does the Census Bureau threaten penalties for failure to provide personal information?

6) The Census Bureau claims it maintains privacy of personal information, Are there any circumstances under which law enforcement or spy agencies can access Census information?

7) Since presumably Census data may be subpoenaed by law enforcement, may individuals refuse to answer questions according to the fifth Amendment?

8) Why has the Census Bureau decided to collect GPS coordinates for every home?

9) Virtually every government database has been either lost, hacked or compromised, would the Census Bureau’s claim of data security not be an outright lie or at best highly improbable?

10) How would the Census Bureau locate, protect and compensate those individuals whose data becomes compromised?

There is a great deal of confusion about the Census “short form” and “Long Form” because the Census Bureau has failed to equally publicize the two current approaches. Part of the video refers to the long form called the “American Community Survey” which has 12 pages of questions, many of which are much more probing than the short form. A PDF file of the the long form can be viewed at this link: http://www.jerryday.com/images/ACS-1-…

November 11, 2009

An Historian’s Viewpoint on the Healthcare Debate

Tom Woods Provides Some Historical Perspective to the National Healthcare Debate

Operation Health Freedom – Tom Woods

by Matt Hawes
of Campaign For Liberty

Source: Campaign For Liberty

As part of Campaign For Liberty’s Operation Health Freedom series, bestselling author Tom Woods gives a historian’s perspective on the health care debate.